Abstractive Health
Abstractive Health
APICME Credits
Abstractive Health
Abstractive Health
Trustworthy AI

Trust, transparency and safety are sacrosanct when it comes to patient health. Learn how we're continually developing our medical-grade AI system.

Abstractive Health
Built for healthcare

Designed for clinical language and real-world workflows

Our medical AI assistant understands medical terminology and operates accurately within the clinical domain. By utilizing training data closely aligned with real-world use cases, our models have deep expertise in healthcare contexts.
Built for healthcare
Evaluation

Rigorous testing and clinician evaluation

For every new feature or model change, we run human evaluations before launch. Clinicians score both quality and safety (1-5) across the dimensions below.

Readability

Is the summary well-written using professional language as a trained physician?

Completeness

Does the summary include the critical clinical information needed for care?

Curation

Does the summary exclude irrelevant noise and focus on what matters clinically?

Correctness

Does it avoid hallucinations, knowledge gaps, faulty logic, and bias?

We also capture overall usefulness and ethicality scores, and use failures to drive targeted improvements in prompts, retrieval, and model behavior.

Safety partner

Partnered with Guardrails AI

Abstractive Health partnered with Guardrails AI to further bolster the safety and reliability of our AI solution for clinicians. Guardrails offers an additional validation framework that reinforces the integrity of our LLM applications. Through their services, users can confidently utilize Abstractive Health without concerns about patient data breaches, unsettling hallucinations, or system inconsistiencies.
Monitoring

Continuous performance monitoring

Once the AI system is online, we combine automated faithfulness signals with physician review to monitor generated outputs. If scores fall below a threshold for a sustained period, we investigate and take action quickly.
Performance monitoring
Rubrics

Transparent clinician rating criteria

Each quality dimension has clear 1-5 rubrics (1 = lowest quality, 5 = highest). In addition, we collect overall usefulness and ethicality scores to ensure outputs meet clinician expectations and safety standards.
Clinician rating rubric
Publications

The research behind our clinical AI.

JAMA Network Open
Developing and Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Emergency Medicine Handoff Notes

By Vince Hartman, MS; Xinyuan Zhang, PhD; Ritika Poddar, MS; Matthew McCarty, MD; Alexander Fortenko, MD, MPH; Evan Sholle, MS; Rahul Sharma, MD, MBA; Thomas Campion Jr, PhD; Peter A. D. Steel, MA, MBBS

Dec 03, 2024

JAMIA
A Method to Automate the Discharge Summary Hospital Course for Neurology Patients

By Vince Hartman, MS, Sanika S Bapat, MS, Mark G Weiner, MD, Babak B Navi, MD, Evan T Sholle, MS, Thomas R Campion, Jr, PhD

Aug 28, 2023

AMIA
A Day-to-Day Approach for Automating the Hospital Course Section of the Discharge Summary

By Vince Hartman, BA and Thomas R. Campion, Jr., PhD

May 23, 2022

Want to see trustworthy clinical AI in action?

Try Abstractive Health and review patient summaries with evidence.
Stay ahead of the curve in healthcare innovation.
Connect

333 E 56 St, Apt 7N, New York, NY 10022

support@abstractivehealth.comLinkedIn ↗Instagram ↗

©2026 Abstractive Health. All Rights Reserved.

Certified B Corporation